Can Rexx replace clist

IBM's Command List programming language & Restructured Extended Executor

Can Rexx replace clist

Postby GeorgeQ » Thu Jun 22, 2017 5:02 am


Rexx is upgrade version of Clist, My question is if REXX an totally replace/cover clist?

Because I want to learn rexx/clist. Can I skip clist and only learn rexx will that be enough to handle both rexx and clist knowledge?

Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:08 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Can Rexx replace clist


Re: Can Rexx replace clist

Postby NicC » Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:07 pm

Clists and Rexx are 2 diffferent languages - one is not an "upgrade" of the other.
Concentrate on Rexx - it is easier (to me anyway) and pfobavly more powerful. You can also get a version that can run on your PC at home so you can learn outside of work hours.

Beware, though - the mainframe version your file handling is different from the PC. On the mainframe you use an external function - EXECIO. On the PC you can use the Linein and Lineout or Charin and Charout. OORexx on the PC has a minimal version of EXECIO.
The problem I have is that people can explain things quickly but I can only comprehend slowly.
Global moderator
Posts: 2751
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:13 am
Location: Pushing up the daisies (almost)
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Re: Can Rexx replace clist

Postby willy jensen » Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:39 pm

I agree with Nic. There are few special cases where CLIST is better, but in general REXX is by far the better product. And much easier to work with too.
willy jensen
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 5:03 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 23 times

Return to CLIST & REXX


  • Related topics
    Last post