Doubt Delete dataset



JES, JES2, JCL utilities, IDCAMS, Compile & Run JCLs, PROCs etc...

Doubt Delete dataset

Postby rickertrollins » Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:47 am

I am havings a doubt to delete VTAM data set, CC=0?? Is there beings any way find problem? IGYWCLG not work?? DISP=RECFM?
rickertrollins
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 2:41 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Doubt Delete dataset

 

Re: Doubt Delete dataset

Postby Bill Dennis » Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:01 am

Please get your terminology straight.

VTAM or VSAM?

IGYWCLG is a compiler proc?!?

DISP and RECFM are separate parameters.

If your delete fails with greater than CC=0 there will be SYSPRINT to explain why.
Regards,

Bill Dennis

Disclaimer: My comments on this forum are my own and do not represent the opinions or suggestions of any other person or business entity.
Bill Dennis
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:45 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Doubt Delete dataset

Postby dick scherrer » Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:26 am

Hello and welcome to the forum,

When there is a problem you want to ask the forum about, you need to post the JCL and control statements submitted along with the informational/diagnostic output from the execution.
Hope this helps,
d.sch.
User avatar
dick scherrer
Global moderator
 
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:58 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Doubt Delete dataset

Postby disarray » Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:51 am

Yeah, IGYWCLG is the old way, it's never really used anymore. Try this:

//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//DELDD DD DSN=SYS1.VTAMLST,DISP=(OLD,DELETE,DELETE)
Do not do this without specific direction/permission

That should take care of your VTAM network. Everything should be TCP/IP now anyway. There's another command for SNA, but I'm not really sure.
disarray
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:49 am
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Doubt Delete dataset

Postby dick scherrer » Thu Aug 06, 2009 6:33 am

Hello,

Yeah, IGYWCLG is the old way, it's never really used anymore
Wherever did you get this idea - it is completely wrong. . . It also has nothing to do with either VSAM or VTAM. This is for a COBOL compile, link, and "go".

Why would you suggest deleting a sys1 dataset?

Why would you believe everything should be tcp/ip now? Rest assured, vtam is very alive.

It is understandable that the TS (Topic Starter) is new and has many questions/misconceptions. The people providing solutions/suggestions should not "just throw things in". . .

We are waiting for the requirement to be clarified. . . Then we should be able to properly reply.
Hope this helps,
d.sch.
User avatar
dick scherrer
Global moderator
 
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:58 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 91 times


Return to JCL

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post