13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION



JES, JES2, JCL utilities, IDCAMS, Compile & Run JCLs, PROCs etc...

13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION

Postby samb01 » Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:12 pm

hello,

i've got a problme whith a job which ended in error under SDSF.

This job was running by OPC (TWS) but it stayed started under OPC... :?: (not in error)

But the job restarted immeditly with the follwing message :

13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION

I can't anderstand why...

Could you help me please ?
samb01
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:24 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: 13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION

 

Re: 13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION

Postby Bill Dennis » Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:13 am

Probably an operator issued a $E Jnnnnn command and restarted the job.
Regards,

Bill Dennis

Disclaimer: My comments on this forum are my own and do not represent the opinions or suggestions of any other person or business entity.
Bill Dennis
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:45 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: 13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION

Postby samb01 » Wed Dec 09, 2009 6:13 pm

Yes, you're right.

But do you know how can we desactivate this command ?

Because it's too dansgerous...

Thanks
samb01
 
Posts: 239
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:24 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: 13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION

Postby expat » Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:28 pm

You will need to make a formal request to the systems programmers to see if it is possible to deactivate, or to your security administration to limit the number of persons able to issue the command.

You will need a solid business case in order to achieve this request.

Also, please explain your reasons for believing that this is a dangerous command.
expat
 
Posts: 382
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 3:21 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 13.17.25 JOB04043 $HASP398 JOBNAME QUEUED FOR RE-EXECUTION

Postby Bill Dennis » Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:08 am

There is a JES Exit for command processing where these could be intercepted. I did this at a prior employer.

The danger of the command is that all the existing SYSOUT is blown away. It's bad if the job has started and someone issues the command in error.
Regards,

Bill Dennis

Disclaimer: My comments on this forum are my own and do not represent the opinions or suggestions of any other person or business entity.
Bill Dennis
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 9:45 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time


Return to JCL

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post