why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution



why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution

Postby er.manishawasthi » Sun Aug 17, 2008 7:22 pm

hI

sO MY STUPID QUESTION IS -----

WHILE coding the Disp parameter in jcl ....

Disp=(a,b,c)

cis meant for abnormal execution . well i wanted to know why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution ....

This question comes in my mind again again....and now the stupidity is too much that i need ur support
er.manishawasthi
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:36 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution

 

Re: why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution

Postby dick scherrer » Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:54 pm

Hello,

well i wanted to know why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution ....
Because IBM does not provide for this.

It probably was not provided for because it makes no sense to "pass" a dataset out of an abended run. There is nowhere to "pass" them to. . .

If i misunderstand, please clarify.
Hope this helps,
d.sch.
User avatar
dick scherrer
Global moderator
 
Posts: 6304
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:58 am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: why don't we have the option of pass in abnormal execution

Postby er.manishawasthi » Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:57 pm

i got it thnku.........
er.manishawasthi
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 7:36 pm
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time


Return to Stupid Questions