Hi all,
I have a COBOL program A to be modified. It has static call to another program B.
I have included these two programs to the changeman package and promoted and tested it, it works well. However the Audit step fails.
It gives SYNCH8 and says there are 30 other programs that call program B and they have to be compiled first and then program B.
If I include these 30 programs, these further call and are called by many other programs around 200 or more.
Please suggest me how to resolve this.
Thank You!!!
Static linking and changeman
Re: Static linking and changeman
Tried using dynamic linking. Then the job that calls these COBOL programs failes with S0C1 abend
-
- Global moderator
- Posts: 3006
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:25 pm
- Skillset: tso,rexx,assembler,pl/i,storage,mvs,os/390,z/os,
- Referer: www.ibmmainframes.com
Re: Static linking and changeman
something smells foul in the state of denmark
if You had changed also B then it would be proper to rebuild/promote/WTF all the callers
but since YOU told that only A was changed no reason to rebuild all the other thingies ?
why not speak to our support ???

if You had changed also B then it would be proper to rebuild/promote/WTF all the callers
but since YOU told that only A was changed no reason to rebuild all the other thingies ?
I have a COBOL program A to be modified. It has static call to another program B.
why not speak to our support ???
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
Re: Static linking and changeman
Unfortunately there is no support 

-
- Global moderator
- Posts: 3006
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:25 pm
- Skillset: tso,rexx,assembler,pl/i,storage,mvs,os/390,z/os,
- Referer: www.ibmmainframes.com
Re: Static linking and changeman
Unfortunately there is no support
hard to believe,
who did the CHANGEMAN customization ?
I have not worked with CHANGEMAN
but under SCLM and ENDEVOR noooo way for something like that to happen
if the PACKAGES have been defined properly
just think a bit please, when You modify something
the integrity/consistency is guaranteed by rebuilding all the ancestor chain ( THE CALLERS )
no reason to rebuild the descendants ( THE CALLED )
looks like there is something wrong in the definitions
Last edited by enrico-sorichetti on Thu Mar 13, 2014 11:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
Re: Static linking and changeman
Ex-team member. No longer in the company.
-
- Global moderator
- Posts: 3006
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:25 pm
- Skillset: tso,rexx,assembler,pl/i,storage,mvs,os/390,z/os,
- Referer: www.ibmmainframes.com
Re: Static linking and changeman
pretty shortsighted organization isn' t it
better if somebody with the proper authority takes care of it
Your organization cannot expect to get free consultancy on a forum
better if somebody with the proper authority takes care of it
Your organization cannot expect to get free consultancy on a forum
cheers
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
enrico
When I tell somebody to RTFM or STFW I usually have the page open in another tab/window of my browser,
so that I am sure that the information requested can be reached with a very small effort
-
- Global moderator
- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:13 am
- Skillset: JCL, PL/1, Rexx, Utilities and to a lesser extent (i.e. I have programmed using them) COBOL,DB2,IMS
- Referer: Google
- Location: Pushing up the daisies (almost)
Re: Static linking and changeman
The question is: why do anything with B when only A needed modifying? Endevor thinks B has been modified so it needs to be re-linked in. Just get rid of B out of your package and the original B load module will be linked in and Changeman will be happy.
The problem I have is that people can explain things quickly but I can only comprehend slowly.
Regards
Nic
Regards
Nic
Re: Static linking and changeman
If I dont include B, i get following error while compiling A. Since A calls B statically.
MODULE B IDENTIFIED BY DDNAME SYSLIB IS NOT A VALID PROGRAM OBJECT. CODE 1
ERRORS ENCOUNTERED ATTEMPTING TO INCLUDE MEMBER B DURING AUTOCALL
SYMBOL B UNRESOLVED. MEMBER COULD NOT BE INCLUDED FROM THE DESIGNATED CALL LIBRARY.
MODULE B IDENTIFIED BY DDNAME SYSLIB IS NOT A VALID PROGRAM OBJECT. CODE 1
ERRORS ENCOUNTERED ATTEMPTING TO INCLUDE MEMBER B DURING AUTOCALL
SYMBOL B UNRESOLVED. MEMBER COULD NOT BE INCLUDED FROM THE DESIGNATED CALL LIBRARY.
- dick scherrer
- Global moderator
- Posts: 6268
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:58 am
Re: Static linking and changeman
Hello,
I'd recommend hyour organization "rent" an expert to review your implementation, document what you have, and teach you (or someone else) to be the new administrator. I'd be quite uncomfortable is i believed some/all of my source might be at risk.
I'd recommend hyour organization "rent" an expert to review your implementation, document what you have, and teach you (or someone else) to be the new administrator. I'd be quite uncomfortable is i believed some/all of my source might be at risk.
Hope this helps,
d.sch.
d.sch.