IBM Mainframe Forum

by **jvinoth** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:37 pm

hi can anyone please tell me why this message comes which cauesd this problem..and i have submitted the job which has division program.

Select all

06:58:28.37 TSU00395 00000094 ICH408I USER(jvinoth ) GROUP(H7042B2 ) NAME(jvinoth

842 00000094 CATALOG.SCH2.losh.TSO08 CL(DATASET ) VOL(S223

842 00000094 INSUFFICIENT ACCESS AUTHORITY

842 00000094 FROM CATALOG.*.** (G)

842 00000094 ACCESS INTENT(ALTER ) ACCESS ALLOWED(UPDATE

is it because of the jcl...

by **BillyBoyo** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:46 pm

You have violated your site's security policy.

This is probably unintentional on your part.

It may be JCL or it may be some control card to a program executed by the JCL.

Might be an idea to ask your boss if you can go and talk to the "RACF people" so you can understand how things are set up at your site and what you can and can't do. Migth sooth them and make them feel needed as well :-)

by **jvinoth** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:57 pm

Select all

//STEP EXEC PGM=PROGRAM9
//DD1 DD DSN=inputfilename,DISP=SHR
//SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSABOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUDUMP DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSDBOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
/*
//

its a jcl i have used....is there any problem in this JCL

by **jvinoth** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:58 pm

can we identify exactly what cause this problem...

by **BillyBoyo** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:09 pm

Yes. See the RACF people at your site. They can explain the setup at your site. We can't. I'm not saying you can't tell by following up all the messages, but I am saying it will be useful to talk to them anyway so you understand what the RACF policy is as it applies to you as a developer.

by **steve-myers** » Fri Jan 27, 2012 9:39 pm

If the JCL is correct - and I would not bet the farm on that - then it's up to what that PROGRAM9 is trying to do to the catalog.

Billyboyo, I very much doubt the TS is a developer; he or she seems to be too dumb.

IBM Mainframe Forum

racf violation

racf violation

Re: racf violation

Re: racf violation

Re: racf violation

Re: racf violation

Re: racf violation